Model of a Ballgame with Spectators

Artist: Unknown

100 B.C.–A.D. 250

Art of the Ancient Americas

Villagers crowd around the edge of a ball court to watch the game within. Men wearing breechcloths and belts and women in skirts, wrap their arm around children and each other. Many huddle in blankets or hold pots. This model was placed inside a tomb, perhaps to commemorate a ballgame in which the deceased took part. Six of the viewers - the four located at one end of the court (to the right) as well as the man climbing the staircase and his companion seated atop it - are modern restorations.

Audio Guides

Andrew Turner, Scholar

0:00 0:00
View transcript

My name is Andrew Turner, and I've been working as a postdoctoral associate in the Art of the Ancient Americas through a joint appointment in both the Yale University Art Gallery and the Art History Department. So what we're looking at is a little model that shows the Mesoamerican ballgame being played. There're several really interesting things about the Mesoamerican ballgame.

One, it's probably the oldest continuously played sport in the world, and it is still played today in parts of West Mexico. It's even being revitalized in the Central Valley of California by migrants who've come up from the western states of Jalisco, Zacatecas, Michoacán, and Oaxaca. Usually the game is played in a special stone-lined court that's shaped—at least if you're looking at it from a bird's-eye view—like a capital letter "I," with a central playing alley and two end zones on either end.

Two, the game would be played with rules more or less similar to soccer in that you couldn't touch the ball with your hands. You'd bounce the ball off of your hips or maybe shoulders or knees, and the ball is actually made of rubber. Something that's really important and interesting about the Mesoamerican ballgame is it was the first game in the world to use a rubber ball. So basically two teams of people would line up on either side, bounce the ball back and forth, and the goal is to get the ball past the other team or to make it bounce too many times, to where it's dead and out of play.

It almost appears as if we're watching two different moments of the same game, because if you look, there are way too many balls for the game to be played. From what we understand about the game, it's basically anywhere from one to six players on a side, and they're bouncing one ball back and forth. And there are possibly five things here that you could consider to be balls in this game, although I think three of those are probably court markers. So there's one more or less in the center of the court, and there're two that are kind of lined up with that, at either end. But then there are two that are off-center, and I think those might actually be the balls that these players are using.

And also you can notice that the players seem to be clustered around different areas of activity. So, this raises some interesting questions. Are we looking at a game in which two balls are being played? Or are we looking at something that's not a snapshot moment of one moment in the game but, rather, two different points in the game? Or maybe these two different points suggest a sort of continuous play in the game that we might not otherwise think of, if we only saw, say, one ball being played by two teams of people.

A famous mythical story is the Popol Vuh, which is the Maya creation epic that was written down in the eighteenth century. Basically it involves two hero twins who go down into the underworld, where they play the ballgame against these underworld deities. One of the twins ends up becoming decapitated, and then they finally end up defeating Death. He's resurrected, and he becomes the maize god. So he's actually a symbol of corn and a symbol of regeneration; he actually defeats death.

This leads a lot of modern people to assume that the winner of the ballgame would get decapitated in Mesoamerica. And I just really don't think that's true. I mean, I think, just logically, you'd run out of good players pretty quickly if you were decapitating all the winners. And above and beyond that, what would be the incentive to win? I think the honor of symbolically being the maize god, when push comes to shove, probably wouldn't do it for you. But there were high-stakes games in which losers would probably be decapitated.

For the Maya, we know that rulers would play ball against each other sometimes. Usually this would follow a warfare event between two cities. So one ruler would capture another in warfare, and rather than executing them on the field, they would play ball against each other, one on one. Almost invariably the victorious city's king would beat the other player, and that player (i.e., the ruler from the other city) would be decapitated. And we do actually have artwork showing decapitated ball players going back to at least A.D. 600 or 700.

The ballgame is a really important part of civic identity. It's really important for mythology. The ballgame, we sometimes think, is symbolically linked to the movement of the sun. The ball might be something like the sun, so a ceremonial game might perpetuate the movement of the sun.

Others link it to making rain. The ball court seems to be a sunken space and sometimes even a symbolic pool of water. The loud thud of that solid rubber ball on the floor might actually mimic thunder, which would invoke rain. But it's an absolutely important part of Mesoamerican culture and elite identity, civic identity, mythology, et cetera, et cetera.

Medium

Ceramic with pigment

Dimensions

5 7/8 × 10 1/4 × 17 3/4 in. (15 × 26 × 45.1 cm)

Credit Line

Stephen Carlton Clark, B.A. 1903, Fund

Accession Number

1973.88.26

Geography
Period

Protoclassic Period

Classification
Disclaimer

Note: This electronic record was created from historic documentation that does not necessarily reflect the Yale University Art Gallery’s complete or current knowledge about the object. Review and updating of records is ongoing.

Provenance

Provenance

Fred H. Olsen (1891–1986), and Florence Quittenton Olsen, Guilford, Conn.; gift in 1973 to Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, Conn.
Bibliography
  • Mary E. Miller, The Art of Mesoamerica: From Olmec to Aztec, 5th edition (London: Thames and Hudson, 2012), 67, fig. 55
  • Mary E. Miller, The Art of Mesoamerica: From Olmec to Aztec, 5th ed. (London: Thames and Hudson, 2012), 67, fig. 55
  • Ronald J. Meyers, "Literature and Sport as Ritual and Fantasy," Papers on Language and Literature 37, no. 4 (2001), Cover image
  • Susan B. Matheson, Art for Yale: A History of the Yale University Art Gallery (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Art Gallery, 2001), 167–68, fig. 166
  • Richard F. Townsend, ed., Ancient West Mexico: Art and Archaeology of the Unknown Past, exh. cat. (Chicago: Art Institute of Chicago, 1998), 162–63, fig. 21
  • Helen Pollard, "Recent Research in West Mexican Archaeology," Journal of Archeological Research 5 (1997), 345–84
  • Mary E. Miller and Karl Taube, An Illustrated Dictionary of The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Mexico and the Maya (New York: Thames and Hudson, 1993), 42–44
  • Elise K. Kenney, ed., Handbook of the Collections: Yale University Art Gallery (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Art Gallery, 1992), 314, ill.
  • Vernon L. Scarborough and David R. Wilcox, eds., The Mesoamerican Ballgame (Tucson, Ariz.: University of Arizona Press, 1991)
  • Michael Kan, Clement W. Meighan, and Henry B. Nicholson, Sculpture of Ancient West Mexico: Nayarit, Jalisco, Colima, 2, exh. cat. (Los Angeles: Los Angeles County Museum of Art, 1989)
  • Ted J. Leyenaar and Lee Allen Parsons, Ulama: Het Balspel Bij de Maya's en Azteken, 2000 v. Chr.–000 n. Chr.: Van Mensenoffer Tot Sport (The Ballgame of the Mayas and Aztecs, 2000 B.C.–2000 A.D.: From Human Sacrifice to Sport)



    (Leiden, Netherlands: Spruyt, Van Mantgem, & De Does, 1988)
  • George A. Kubler, ed., Pre-Columbian Art of Mexico and Central America (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Art Gallery, 1986), 30, 183–84, 357, no. 409, Color pl. 11, fig. 240
  • Jacki Gallagher, Companions of the Dead: Tomb Sculpture from Ancient West Mexico, exh. cat. (Los Angeles: Fowler Museum at UCLA, 1983)
  • Betty Bell, ed., The Archaeology of West Mexico (Ajijic, Mexico: West Mexican Society for Advanced Study, 1974)
  • "Acquisitions, 1973," Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin 35, no. 1 (Summer 1974), 77, ill.
  • Peter T. Furst, West Mexican Art: Secular or Sacred? The Iconography of Middle American Sculpture (New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1973), 98–133
  • Hasso Von Winning and Olga Hammer, Ancecdotal Sculpture of Ancient West Mexico, exh. cat. (Los Angeles: Ethnic Arts Council of Los Angeles, 1972)
  • "New Acquisitions Issue," Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin 24, no. 1 (April 1958), 16, ill.
  • Salvador Toscano and Federico Canessi, Arte Precolombino del Occidente de Mexico (Mexico City: Dirección General de Educación Extra-Escolar y Estética, 1946)
Object copyright
Additional information

Object/Work type

figures (representations), funerary art

Technical metadata and APIs

IIIF

Open in Mirador

View IIIF manifest

The International Image Interoperability Framework, or IIIF, is an open standard for delivering high-quality, attributed digital objects online at scale. Visit iiif.io to learn more

Linked Art

API response for this object

Linked Art is a Community working together to create a shared Model based on Linked Open Data to describe Art.